linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 20/50] dt-bindings: atmel-nand: add microchip,sam9x7-pmecc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b5c44fc5-005d-6268-af68-85eda9c330ba@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 12:06:35 +0100
From:   Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To:     Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>,
        miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/50] dt-bindings: atmel-nand: add
 microchip,sam9x7-pmecc



On 7/28/23 11:26, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
> Add microchip,sam9x7-pmecc to DT bindings documentation.
> 

Why? What's the underlying problem that motivated you do this patch?

> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> index 50645828ac20..4598930851d9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ Required properties:
>  	"atmel,sama5d4-pmecc"
>  	"atmel,sama5d2-pmecc"
>  	"microchip,sam9x60-pmecc"
> +	"microchip,sam9x7-pmecc", "atmel,at91sam9g45-pmecc"
>  - reg: should contain 2 register ranges. The first one is pointing to the PMECC
>         block, and the second one to the PMECC_ERRLOC block.
>