linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 20/50] dt-bindings: atmel-nand: add microchip,sam9x7-pmecc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:54:51 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
        Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>,
        miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/50] dt-bindings: atmel-nand: add
 microchip,sam9x7-pmecc

On 28/07/2023 13:06, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/28/23 11:26, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
>> Add microchip,sam9x7-pmecc to DT bindings documentation.
>>
> 
> Why? What's the underlying problem that motivated you do this patch?

Isn't the problem already described in commit msg, although shortly:
There is a new SoC sam9x7, where the model name is sam9x7 and it is not
a wild-card nor family name of SoCs, and we add compatible for it, as
expected by writing-bindings guideline.

Best regards,
Krzysztof