linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] i2c: designware: Move has_acpi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <928d54c4-ec71-5f09-ed66-5f9c52aca6ba@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 14:33:07 +0300
From:   Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] i2c: designware: Move has_acpi_companion() to
 common code

On 7/26/23 00:45, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 05:30:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> Instead of checking in callers, move the call to the callee.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c  | 11 +++++++++--
>>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c  |  3 +--
>>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c |  3 +--
>>   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c
>> index cdd8c67d9129..683f7a9beb46 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c
>> @@ -255,9 +255,8 @@ static void i2c_dw_acpi_params(struct device *device, char method[],
>>   	kfree(buf.pointer);
>>   }
>>   
>> -int i2c_dw_acpi_configure(struct device *device)
>> +static void i2c_dw_acpi_do_configure(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, struct device *device)

Because of this dual dev pointer obscurity which is cleaned in the next 
patch and Andi's comment below in my opinion it makes sense to combine 
patches 1 and 2.

>>   {
>> -	struct dw_i2c_dev *dev = dev_get_drvdata(device);
>>   	struct i2c_timings *t = &dev->timings;
>>   	u32 ss_ht = 0, fp_ht = 0, hs_ht = 0, fs_ht = 0;
>>   
>> @@ -285,6 +284,14 @@ int i2c_dw_acpi_configure(struct device *device)
>>   		dev->sda_hold_time = fs_ht;
>>   		break;
>>   	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +int i2c_dw_acpi_configure(struct device *device)
> 
> I was about to ask you why are we keeping this int, but then I
> saw that you are making it void in the next patch :)
>