lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7186a62-19a1-5d72-ee1b-255b81fb8abe@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:40:34 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/50] dt-bindings: clk: at91: add sam9x7 clock
 controller

On 28/07/2023 12:23, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
> Add bindings for SAM9X7's pmc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml          | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
> index c1bdcd9058ed..ce0d99503645 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ properties:
>                - atmel,sama5d4-pmc
>                - microchip,sam9x60-pmc
>                - microchip,sama7g5-pmc
> +              - microchip,sam9x7-pmc
>            - const: syscon

Where is the change in allOf:if:then:? No need for it? Why? Where is the
driver change?

Please do not send huge series to 50 different people and subsystems.
With your lack of threading it is so difficult to review.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ