lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 28 Jul 2023 13:46:51 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/50] dt-bindings: clk: at91: add sam9x7 clock
 controller

On 28/07/2023 13:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/07/2023 12:23, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
>> Add bindings for SAM9X7's pmc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml          | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
>> index c1bdcd9058ed..ce0d99503645 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
>> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ properties:
>>                - atmel,sama5d4-pmc
>>                - microchip,sam9x60-pmc
>>                - microchip,sama7g5-pmc
>> +              - microchip,sam9x7-pmc
>>            - const: syscon
> 
> Where is the change in allOf:if:then:? No need for it? Why? Where is the
> driver change?
> 
> Please do not send huge series to 50 different people and subsystems.
> With your lack of threading it is so difficult to review.

You already got this comment and not much improved:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/f2f8cabf-ca4d-c6f3-5561-b24334be89d1@linaro.org/

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ