linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 05/50] dt-bindings: clk: at91: add sam9x7 clock controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2023 05:31:49 +0000
From:   <Varshini.Rajendran@...rochip.com>
To:     <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/50] dt-bindings: clk: at91: add sam9x7 clock
 controller

On 28/07/23 5:10 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 28/07/2023 12:23, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
>> Add bindings for SAM9X7's pmc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml          | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
>> index c1bdcd9058ed..ce0d99503645 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
>> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ properties:
>>                 - atmel,sama5d4-pmc
>>                 - microchip,sam9x60-pmc
>>                 - microchip,sama7g5-pmc
>> +              - microchip,sam9x7-pmc
>>             - const: syscon
> 
> Where is the change in allOf:if:then:? No need for it? Why? Where is the
> driver change?

Hi Krzysztof,

This SoC has a new pmc driver and is not dependent on any other 
compatible as a fallback. So I think adding it in the enum makes sense. 
Correct me if I am wrong. The driver is in the series. Apologies for 
breaking the thread. I will send another version following your advice 
about splitting up the patch series.
> 
> Please do not send huge series to 50 different people and subsystems.
> With your lack of threading it is so difficult to review.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Varshini Rajendran.