linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] csky: fix old style declaration in module.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <ef413a40-ddc4-4d23-bc56-23b7095ffc83@app.fastmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 29 Jul 2023 09:06:19 +0200
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To:     guoren <guoren@...nel.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     "linux-csky@...r.kernel.org" <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] csky: fix old style declaration in module.c

On Sat, Jul 29, 2023, at 06:59, Guo Ren wrote:
> Thx Arnd,
>
> Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
>
> You could directly put it in your next tree. If you need me to do
> that, please don't hesitate to let me know.

I don't currently plan to send a pull request for the warning
fixes, please just merge it through your own tree for 6.5 or
6.6.

I'd like to enable a few warning options (-Wextra, -Wrestrict,
-Wmissing-prototypes, ...) in the Kbuild for 6.6, but the Makefile
changes will probably go through the Kbuild tree or linux-mm,
and the fixes for existing warnings can just take their normal way.

     Arnd