linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: power: supply: Add pm8916 VM-BMS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0b41a93ee82674e65a3801f5a37edd5a@trvn.ru>
Date:   Sat, 29 Jul 2023 17:15:06 +0500
From:   Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: power: supply: Add pm8916 VM-BMS

Conor Dooley писал(а) 29.07.2023 17:10:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 05:06:14PM +0500, Nikita Travkin wrote:
>> Conor Dooley писал(а) 29.07.2023 15:03:
>> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 10:19:30PM +0500, Nikita Travkin wrote:
> 
>> >> +  interrupt-names:
>> >> +    items:
>> >> +      - const: fifo
>> >
>> > Same here, but do you really need a name, when you have only one
>> > interrupt?
>> >
>>
>> Hm, thinking of this more, the hardware actually has more than one
>> interrupt, even though this one seems to be the only really useful
>> one. Would a better way forward be to list all of them
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> (and fix
>> the driver to get the value by it's name)
> 
> It's not a fix to do that, the order of the interrupts is not variable,
> so there's nothing wrong with using the indices. You can do it if you
> like.
> 
>> or it would be
>> acceptable to leave the names here and extend the list at a later
>> date when (if ever) other interrupts are needed?
> 
> If you know what they are, please describe them now, even if the driver
> does not use them (yet).
> 

Thanks for the clarification! Will make sure both drivers have all
interrupts described in v2

Nikita

> Thanks,
> Conor.