[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230729222203.5601-1-huangbing775@126.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2023 06:22:03 +0800
From: Bing Huang <huangbing775@....com>
To: dietmar.eggemann@....com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, brauner@...nel.org, bristot@...hat.com,
bsegall@...gle.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mgorman@...e.de, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched/topology: Covered all cpus of same node in asymmetric node setups
in asymmetric node setups, if one cpu'sd spans is empty in some depth,
others in same node do
Signed-off-by: Bing Huang <huangbing@...inos.cn>
---
kernel/sched/topology.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 7cfcfe5d27b9..8c5372ad7694 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -1045,8 +1045,10 @@ build_overlap_sched_groups(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
* Domains should always include the CPU they're built on, so
* check that.
*/
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sibling)))
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sibling))) {
+ cpumask_or(covered, covered, cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(i)));
continue;
+ }
/*
* Usually we build sched_group by sibling's child sched_domain
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists