[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230731165738.GA14380@bhelgaas>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 11:57:38 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, robh@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: qcom-ep: Treat unknown irq events as an error
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 08:59:31PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Sometimes, the Qcom PCIe EP controller can receive some interrupts that are
> not known to the driver like safety interrupts in newer SoCs. In those
> cases, if the driver doesn't clear the interrupts, then it will end up in
> interrupt storm. But the users won't have any idea about it due to the log
> being treated as a debug message.
>
> So let's treat the unknown event log as an error, so that it at least makes
> the user aware, thereby getting fixed eventually.
Would it be practical to log the error message, then clear the
interrupt to avoid the interrupt storm?
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> index 267e1247d548..802dedcc929c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ static irqreturn_t qcom_pcie_ep_global_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
> dw_pcie_ep_linkup(&pci->ep);
> pcie_ep->link_status = QCOM_PCIE_EP_LINK_UP;
> } else {
> - dev_dbg(dev, "Received unknown event: %d\n", status);
> + dev_err(dev, "Received unknown event: %d\n", status);
> }
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists