[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1237441e-3e1a-4682-b3bf-face931640d3@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 19:03:31 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"ardb@...nel.org" <ardb@...nel.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Szabolcs.Nagy@....com" <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>,
"james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
"debug@...osinc.com" <debug@...osinc.com>,
"aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"hjl.tools@...il.com" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
"paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"suzuki.poulose@....com" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
"kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev" <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"oliver.upton@...ux.dev" <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 21/36] arm64/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack()
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 08:28:14PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 05:07:00PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> > So the question is not what mode should arm support, but should we have
> > the flags match between x86 and ARM?
> What if the flag will be called, say, SHADOW_STACK_DEFAULT_INIT?
> Then each arch can push whatever it likes to and from the userspace
> perspective the shadow stack will have some basic init state, no matter
> what architecture it is.
x86 might have some fun with that and the existing userspace binaries...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists