[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ewu46co43ldtnsedbaqvs4ihpebr7wxjbpum32iq4i766egpyu@bzocmghr636q>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 13:29:01 -0600
From: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: bpf_link: avoid unused-function warning
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 07:27:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2023, at 17:20, Daniel Xu wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 05:02:41PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >>
> >> The newly added function is unused in some random configurations:
> >>
> >> net/netfilter/nf_bpf_link.c:32:1: error: 'get_proto_defrag_hook' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> >> 32 | get_proto_defrag_hook(struct bpf_nf_link *link,
> >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >
> > This was fixed in 81584c23f249 ("netfilter: bpf: Only define
> > get_proto_defrag_hook() if necessary").
>
> Ok, I guess this will be in tomorrow's linux-next then, right?
>
> Arnd
I'm not too familiar with the linux-next process, but chatgpt is telling
me it should be.
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists