linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cgroup: minor cleanup for cgroup_local_stat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3ec1f5d9-4887-4583-a973-92298a9bc924@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2023 15:48:09 +0800
From:   Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:     <hannes@...xchg.org>, <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: minor cleanup for cgroup_local_stat_show()

On 2023/8/1 7:47, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 07:50:11PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> On 2023/7/26 9:06, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>> On 2023/7/26 5:53, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 11:19:32AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>>>> Make it under CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED to rid of __maybe_unused annotation.
>>>>> Also put cgroup_tryget_css() inside CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED as it's only
>>>>> called when CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED. No functional change intended.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>>>>
>>>> Patch doesn't apply to cgroup/for-6.6. Can you please respin?
>>>
>>> Sure. Will resend the patch based on cgroup/for-6.6.
>>
>> The commit "sched: add throttled time stat for throttled children" is still in the linux-next tree. So I think I have
>> to wait for it to be merged into cgroup tree first.
> 
> You can just send the patch against cgroup/for-6.6 branch. We can sort out
> the merge conflicts later.

Do you mean send the patch against cgroup/for-6.6 branch assuming commit "sched: add throttled time stat for throttled children"
has been merged into cgroup/for-6.6 branch? It seems the current code in that branch is fine itself.

Thanks for your advice.