[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZMqxCVOkU7pKK9OO@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 09:39:53 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, lizefan.x@...edance.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: minor cleanup for cgroup_local_stat_show()
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 03:48:09PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2023/8/1 7:47, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 07:50:11PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> >> On 2023/7/26 9:06, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> >>> On 2023/7/26 5:53, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 11:19:32AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> >>>>> Make it under CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED to rid of __maybe_unused annotation.
> >>>>> Also put cgroup_tryget_css() inside CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED as it's only
> >>>>> called when CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED. No functional change intended.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Patch doesn't apply to cgroup/for-6.6. Can you please respin?
> >>>
> >>> Sure. Will resend the patch based on cgroup/for-6.6.
> >>
> >> The commit "sched: add throttled time stat for throttled children" is still in the linux-next tree. So I think I have
> >> to wait for it to be merged into cgroup tree first.
> >
> > You can just send the patch against cgroup/for-6.6 branch. We can sort out
> > the merge conflicts later.
>
> Do you mean send the patch against cgroup/for-6.6 branch assuming commit "sched: add throttled time stat for throttled children"
> has been merged into cgroup/for-6.6 branch? It seems the current code in that branch is fine itself.
Ah, I see. That patch isn't going to go through cgroup/for-6.6. It will go
directly from -mm to mainline when the merge window opens. Can you please
resend the patch to Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> with me cc'd?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists