linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cgroup: minor cleanup for cgroup_local_stat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2023 09:38:10 +0800
From:   Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:     <hannes@...xchg.org>, <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: minor cleanup for cgroup_local_stat_show()

On 2023/8/3 3:39, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 03:48:09PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> On 2023/8/1 7:47, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 07:50:11PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>>> On 2023/7/26 9:06, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>>>> On 2023/7/26 5:53, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 11:19:32AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>>>>>> Make it under CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED to rid of __maybe_unused annotation.
>>>>>>> Also put cgroup_tryget_css() inside CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED as it's only
>>>>>>> called when CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED. No functional change intended.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patch doesn't apply to cgroup/for-6.6. Can you please respin?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure. Will resend the patch based on cgroup/for-6.6.
>>>>
>>>> The commit "sched: add throttled time stat for throttled children" is still in the linux-next tree. So I think I have
>>>> to wait for it to be merged into cgroup tree first.
>>>
>>> You can just send the patch against cgroup/for-6.6 branch. We can sort out
>>> the merge conflicts later.
>>
>> Do you mean send the patch against cgroup/for-6.6 branch assuming commit "sched: add throttled time stat for throttled children"
>> has been merged into cgroup/for-6.6 branch? It seems the current code in that branch is fine itself.
> 
> Ah, I see. That patch isn't going to go through cgroup/for-6.6. It will go
> directly from -mm to mainline when the merge window opens. Can you please
> resend the patch to Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> with me cc'd?
> 

Will do. Thanks. :)