[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87il9zkw7h.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 10:23:14 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
Peter Keresztes Schmidt <peter@...esztesschmidt.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 50/58] x86/apic: Provide common init infrastructure
On Tue, Aug 01 2023 at 09:37, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 01.08.23 09:32, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 01 2023 at 09:08, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 01.08.23 08:49, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> void __init xen_init_apic(void)
>>> {
>>> x86_apic_ops.io_apic_read = xen_io_apic_read;
>>> - /* On PV guests the APIC CPUID bit is disabled so none of the
>>> - * routines end up executing. */
>>> - if (!xen_initial_domain())
>>> - apic_install_driver(&xen_pv_apic);
>>> -
>>> x86_platform.apic_post_init = xen_apic_check;
>>
>> I don't think this one is needed.
>
> Indeed.
Can you send a real patch please which I can add to that pile at the
right place?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists