linux-kernel - [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: Clean up errors in smu_v11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230801011237.3913-1-sunran001@208suo.com>
Date:   Tue,  1 Aug 2023 01:12:37 +0000
From:   Ran Sun <sunran001@...suo.com>
To:     apw@...onical.com, joe@...ches.com, alexander.deucher@....com
Cc:     amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Ran Sun <sunran001@...suo.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: Clean up errors in smu_v11_0.h

Fix the following errors reported by checkpatch:

ERROR: that open brace { should be on the previous line
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible

Signed-off-by: Ran Sun <sunran001@...suo.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v11_0.h |  7 +++---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl                        | 23 --------------------
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v11_0.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v11_0.h
index d466db6f0ad4..1b4e0e4716ea 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v11_0.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v11_0.h
@@ -67,8 +67,7 @@ static const __maybe_unused uint16_t link_width[] = {0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16};
 static const __maybe_unused uint16_t link_speed[] = {25, 50, 80, 160};
 
 static const
-struct smu_temperature_range __maybe_unused smu11_thermal_policy[] =
-{
+struct smu_temperature_range __maybe_unused smu11_thermal_policy[] = {
 	{-273150,  99000, 99000, -273150, 99000, 99000, -273150, 99000, 99000},
 	{ 120000, 120000, 120000, 120000, 120000, 120000, 120000, 120000, 120000},
 };
@@ -96,8 +95,8 @@ struct smu_11_0_dpm_table {
 };
 
 struct smu_11_0_pcie_table {
-        uint8_t  pcie_gen[MAX_PCIE_CONF];
-        uint8_t  pcie_lane[MAX_PCIE_CONF];
+	uint8_t  pcie_gen[MAX_PCIE_CONF];
+	uint8_t  pcie_lane[MAX_PCIE_CONF];
 };
 
 struct smu_11_0_dpm_tables {
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 85a0598bf723..528f619520eb 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -7449,23 +7449,6 @@ sub process {
 		}
 
 # Complain about RCU Tasks Trace used outside of BPF (and of course, RCU).
-<<<<<<< HEAD
-<<<<<<< HEAD
-		if ($line =~ /\brcu_read_lock_trace\s*\(/ ||
-		    $line =~ /\brcu_read_lock_trace_held\s*\(/ ||
-		    $line =~ /\brcu_read_unlock_trace\s*\(/ ||
-		    $line =~ /\bcall_rcu_tasks_trace\s*\(/ ||
-		    $line =~ /\bsynchronize_rcu_tasks_trace\s*\(/ ||
-		    $line =~ /\brcu_barrier_tasks_trace\s*\(/ ||
-		    $line =~ /\brcu_request_urgent_qs_task\s*\(/) {
-			if ($realfile !~ m@...rnel/bpf@ &&
-			    $realfile !~ m@...clude/linux/bpf@ &&
-			    $realfile !~ m@...t/bpf@ &&
-			    $realfile !~ m@...rnel/rcu@ &&
-			    $realfile !~ m@...clude/linux/rcu@) {
-=======
-=======
->>>>>>> d7b3af5a77e8d8da28f435f313e069aea5bcf172
 		our $rcu_trace_funcs = qr{(?x:
 			rcu_read_lock_trace |
 			rcu_read_lock_trace_held |
@@ -7482,14 +7465,8 @@ sub process {
 			kernel/rcu/ |
 			include/linux/rcu
 		)};
-<<<<<<< HEAD
-		if ($line =~ /\b$rcu_trace_funcs\s*\(/) {
-			if ($realfile !~ m@...cu_trace_paths@) {
->>>>>>> 4d2c646ac07cf4a35ef1c4a935a1a4fd6c6b1a36
-=======
 		if ($line =~ /\b($rcu_trace_funcs)\s*\(/) {
 			if ($realfile !~ m{^$rcu_trace_paths}) {
->>>>>>> d7b3af5a77e8d8da28f435f313e069aea5bcf172
 				WARN("RCU_TASKS_TRACE",
 				     "use of RCU tasks trace is incorrect outside BPF or core RCU code\n" . $herecurr);
 			}
-- 
2.17.1