[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADnq5_NDLqDPU5n2yLJdp+OAUnnu4LW=uU4HXji0R1usJebtHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 12:17:06 -0400
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To: Ran Sun <sunran001@...suo.com>
Cc: apw@...onical.com, joe@...ches.com, alexander.deucher@....com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: Clean up errors in smu_v11_0.h
Applied with the garbage hunks dropped.
Alex
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 9:12 PM Ran Sun <sunran001@...suo.com> wrote:
>
> Fix the following errors reported by checkpatch:
>
> ERROR: that open brace { should be on the previous line
> ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
>
> Signed-off-by: Ran Sun <sunran001@...suo.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v11_0.h | 7 +++---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 23 --------------------
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v11_0.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v11_0.h
> index d466db6f0ad4..1b4e0e4716ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v11_0.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/smu_v11_0.h
> @@ -67,8 +67,7 @@ static const __maybe_unused uint16_t link_width[] = {0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16};
> static const __maybe_unused uint16_t link_speed[] = {25, 50, 80, 160};
>
> static const
> -struct smu_temperature_range __maybe_unused smu11_thermal_policy[] =
> -{
> +struct smu_temperature_range __maybe_unused smu11_thermal_policy[] = {
> {-273150, 99000, 99000, -273150, 99000, 99000, -273150, 99000, 99000},
> { 120000, 120000, 120000, 120000, 120000, 120000, 120000, 120000, 120000},
> };
> @@ -96,8 +95,8 @@ struct smu_11_0_dpm_table {
> };
>
> struct smu_11_0_pcie_table {
> - uint8_t pcie_gen[MAX_PCIE_CONF];
> - uint8_t pcie_lane[MAX_PCIE_CONF];
> + uint8_t pcie_gen[MAX_PCIE_CONF];
> + uint8_t pcie_lane[MAX_PCIE_CONF];
> };
>
> struct smu_11_0_dpm_tables {
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 85a0598bf723..528f619520eb 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -7449,23 +7449,6 @@ sub process {
> }
>
> # Complain about RCU Tasks Trace used outside of BPF (and of course, RCU).
> -<<<<<<< HEAD
> -<<<<<<< HEAD
> - if ($line =~ /\brcu_read_lock_trace\s*\(/ ||
> - $line =~ /\brcu_read_lock_trace_held\s*\(/ ||
> - $line =~ /\brcu_read_unlock_trace\s*\(/ ||
> - $line =~ /\bcall_rcu_tasks_trace\s*\(/ ||
> - $line =~ /\bsynchronize_rcu_tasks_trace\s*\(/ ||
> - $line =~ /\brcu_barrier_tasks_trace\s*\(/ ||
> - $line =~ /\brcu_request_urgent_qs_task\s*\(/) {
> - if ($realfile !~ m@...rnel/bpf@ &&
> - $realfile !~ m@...clude/linux/bpf@ &&
> - $realfile !~ m@...t/bpf@ &&
> - $realfile !~ m@...rnel/rcu@ &&
> - $realfile !~ m@...clude/linux/rcu@) {
> -=======
> -=======
> ->>>>>>> d7b3af5a77e8d8da28f435f313e069aea5bcf172
> our $rcu_trace_funcs = qr{(?x:
> rcu_read_lock_trace |
> rcu_read_lock_trace_held |
> @@ -7482,14 +7465,8 @@ sub process {
> kernel/rcu/ |
> include/linux/rcu
> )};
> -<<<<<<< HEAD
> - if ($line =~ /\b$rcu_trace_funcs\s*\(/) {
> - if ($realfile !~ m@...cu_trace_paths@) {
> ->>>>>>> 4d2c646ac07cf4a35ef1c4a935a1a4fd6c6b1a36
> -=======
> if ($line =~ /\b($rcu_trace_funcs)\s*\(/) {
> if ($realfile !~ m{^$rcu_trace_paths}) {
> ->>>>>>> d7b3af5a77e8d8da28f435f313e069aea5bcf172
> WARN("RCU_TASKS_TRACE",
> "use of RCU tasks trace is incorrect outside BPF or core RCU code\n" . $herecurr);
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists