lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zg3bxh95.fsf@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 01 Aug 2023 12:07:50 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
        Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
        Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@...il.com>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        Shayne Chen <shayne.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mt76: Replace strlcpy with strscpy

Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:

> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 07:00:21PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
>> 
>> > On Mon, 03 Jul 2023 18:12:56 +0000, Azeem Shaikh wrote:
>> >> strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first.
>> >> This read may exceed the destination size limit.
>> >> This is both inefficient and can lead to linear read
>> >> overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated [1].
>> >> In an effort to remove strlcpy() completely [2], replace
>> >> strlcpy() here with strscpy().
>> >> 
>> >> [...]
>> >
>> > Applied, thanks!
>> >
>> > [1/1] wifi: mt76: Replace strlcpy with strscpy
>> >       https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/535c78cbc0c4
>> 
>> Why did you take this? mt76 is in active development so risk of
>> conflicts is high.
>
> There didn't seem to be any further activity for 3 weeks, and it was a
> relatively mechanical change.

That's because the wireless trees were on a summer break:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/87y1kncuh4.fsf@kernel.org/

> I can drop it from my tree.

Yes, please drop this. And in the future don't take any wireless patches
unless acked by Johannes or me, I want to minimize the risk of conflicts
between the trees. If a patch is missed for whatever reason please let
me know, do not take it to your tree.

> What's needed for it to be picked up through wireless?

I don't know why Felix didn't take this patch but now I assigned it to
me on patchwork:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20230703181256.3712079-1-azeemshaikh38@gmail.com/

It should be in wireless-next this week.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ