lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHirt9gVqE=9vviJEY=kY=booVRmFPHrnFsKCXPXnXiWTB8bZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2023 17:31:54 +0800
From:   WANG Rui <wangrui@...ngson.cn>
To:     Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc:     chenhuacai@...nel.or, kernel@...0n.name, arnd@...db.de,
        andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com, andrzej.hajda@...el.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, will@...nel.org, boqun.feng@...il.com,
        mark.rutland@....com, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fixup cmpxchg sematic for memory barrier

Hello,

On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 5:05 PM Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > The CoRR problem would cause wider problems than this.For this case,
> > do you mean your LL -> LL would be reordered?
> >
> > CPU 0
> >           CPU1
> > LL(2) (set ex-monitor)
> >
> >                 store (break the ex-monitor)
> > LL(1) (reordered instruction set ex-monitor
> > SC(3) (successes ?)
> Sorry for the mail client reformat, I mean:
>
> CPU0  LL(2) (set ex-monitor)
> CPU1  STORE (break the ex-monitor)
> CPU0  LL(1) (reordered instruction set ex-monitor
> CPU0  SC(3) (success?)

No. LL and LL won't reorder because LL implies a memory barrier(though
not acquire semantics).

Regards,
-- 
WANG Rui

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ