[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1728fa16-64ef-e960-c8c7-9935f27ddc83@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 14:39:33 +0300
From: "Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@...el.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 19/29] drm/i915/gvt: switch from ->track_flush_slot()
to ->track_remove_region()
On 7/29/2023 4:35 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
>
> Switch from the poorly named and flawed ->track_flush_slot() to the newly
> introduced ->track_remove_region(). From KVMGT's perspective, the two
> hooks are functionally equivalent, the only difference being that
> ->track_remove_region() is called only when KVM is 100% certain the
> memory region will be removed, i.e. is invoked slightly later in KVM's
> memslot modification flow.
>
> Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
> [sean: handle name change, massage changelog, rebase]
> Tested-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 21 +++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> index 3ea3cb9eb599..3f2327455d85 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> @@ -108,9 +108,8 @@ struct gvt_dma {
>
> static void kvmgt_page_track_write(gpa_t gpa, const u8 *val, int len,
> struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
> -static void kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
> - struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> - struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
> +static void kvmgt_page_track_remove_region(gfn_t gfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> + struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node);
>
> static ssize_t intel_vgpu_show_description(struct mdev_type *mtype, char *buf)
> {
> @@ -666,7 +665,7 @@ static int intel_vgpu_open_device(struct vfio_device *vfio_dev)
> return -EEXIST;
>
> vgpu->track_node.track_write = kvmgt_page_track_write;
> - vgpu->track_node.track_flush_slot = kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot;
> + vgpu->track_node.track_remove_region = kvmgt_page_track_remove_region;
> kvm_get_kvm(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm);
> kvm_page_track_register_notifier(vgpu->vfio_device.kvm,
> &vgpu->track_node);
> @@ -1617,22 +1616,20 @@ static void kvmgt_page_track_write(gpa_t gpa, const u8 *val, int len,
> mutex_unlock(&info->vgpu_lock);
> }
>
> -static void kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
> - struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> - struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node)
> +static void kvmgt_page_track_remove_region(gfn_t gfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> + struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *node)
> {
> unsigned long i;
> - gfn_t gfn;
> struct intel_vgpu *info =
> container_of(node, struct intel_vgpu, track_node);
>
> mutex_lock(&info->vgpu_lock);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < slot->npages; i++) {
> - gfn = slot->base_gfn + i;
> - if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
> - kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn);
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> + if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn + i))
> + kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn + i);
> }
> +
> mutex_unlock(&info->vgpu_lock);
> }
>
Reviewed-by: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists