lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 1 Aug 2023 13:36:20 +0200
From:   Mateusz Schyboll <dragonn@...pl>
To:     mario.limonciello@....com
Cc:     James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, Jason@...c4.com,
        daniil.stas@...teo.net, jarkko@...nel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux@...inikbrodowski.net, regressions@...mhuis.info,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tpm: disable hwrng for fTPM on some AMD designs

I was following the issue under or discord channel ROG for Linux and 
helping out some other users with it by shipping a kernel for Arch with 
disabled CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_TPM as the default recommend kernel for Arch 
for ROG laptops (as my device isn't affect by it because it is Ryzen 
4800HS).

I know it was discussed here 
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217212#c16 against allowing 
the user to disable fTPM to be used as a random source via a boot time 
parameter but I still I disagree with it.

Linux does have a parameter `random.trust_cpu` to control the random 
source from CPU, why they can not be a parameter like 
`random.trust_ftpm` (or `random.trust_tpm`)?

It might be my limited knowledge of this topic but to me it feels like 
if they is a trust_cpu then Linux should have trust_ftpm too.

Mateusz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ