[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a660adba-b73b-1c02-f642-c287bb4c72fc@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 06:23:38 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: next: arm64: gcc-8-defconfig: ufshcd.c:10629:2:
/builds/linux/include/linux/compiler_types.h:397:38: error: call to
'__compiletime_assert_553' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON
failed:
On 8/1/23 05:16, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Following build error noticed while building Linux next-20230801 tag
> arm64 defconfig with gcc-8 toolchain.
>
> Regressions found on arm64:
>
> - build/gcc-8-defconfig
> - build/gcc-8-defconfig-40bc7ee5
>
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> log:
> -----
> In function 'ufshcd_check_header_layout',
> inlined from 'ufshcd_core_init' at
> /builds/linux/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:10629:2:
> /builds/linux/include/linux/compiler_types.h:397:38: error: call to
> '__compiletime_assert_553' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON
> failed: ((u8 *)&(struct request_desc_header){ .enable_crypto = 1})[2]
> != 0x80
> _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> ^
>
>
> Links:
> - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20230801/testrun/18754886/suite/build/test/gcc-8-defconfig/log
> - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20230801/testrun/18754886/suite/build/test/gcc-8-defconfig/details/
> - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20230801/testrun/18754886/suite/build/test/gcc-8-defconfig/history/
I can't reproduce this build error with a gcc-12 arm64 cross-compiler. How
important is gcc-8 for the ARM community?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists