linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] nfsd: don't hand out write delegations on O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8c3adfce-39f0-0e60-e35a-2f1be6fb67e6@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Aug 2023 09:29:37 -0700
From:   dai.ngo@...cle.com
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
        Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@...app.com>,
        Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>
Cc:     linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nfsd: don't hand out write delegations on O_WRONLY
 opens


On 8/1/23 6:33 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I noticed that xfstests generic/001 was failing against linux-next nfsd.
>
> The client would request a OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE open, and the server
> would hand out a write delegation. The client would then try to use that
> write delegation as the source stateid in a COPY

not sure why the client opens the source file of a COPY operation with
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE?

>   or CLONE operation, and
> the server would respond with NFS4ERR_STALE.

If the server does not allow client to use write delegation for the
READ, should the correct error return be NFS4ERR_OPENMODE?

>
> The problem is that the struct file associated with the delegation does
> not necessarily have read permissions. It's handing out a write
> delegation on what is effectively an O_WRONLY open. RFC 8881 states:
>
>   "An OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation allows the client to handle, on its
>    own, all opens."
>
> Given that the client didn't request any read permissions, and that nfsd
> didn't check for any, it seems wrong to give out a write delegation.
>
> Only hand out a write delegation if we have a O_RDWR descriptor
> available. If it fails to find an appropriate write descriptor, go
> ahead and try for a read delegation if NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ was
> requested.
>
> This fixes xfstest generic/001.
>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.linux-nfs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Rework the logic when finding struct file for the delegation. The
>    earlier patch might still have attached a O_WRONLY file to the deleg
>    in some cases, and could still have handed out a write delegation on
>    an O_WRONLY OPEN request in some cases.
> ---
>   fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index ef7118ebee00..e79d82fd05e7 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -5449,7 +5449,7 @@ nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp,
>   	struct nfs4_file *fp = stp->st_stid.sc_file;
>   	struct nfs4_clnt_odstate *odstate = stp->st_clnt_odstate;
>   	struct nfs4_delegation *dp;
> -	struct nfsd_file *nf;
> +	struct nfsd_file *nf = NULL;
>   	struct file_lock *fl;
>   	u32 dl_type;
>   
> @@ -5461,21 +5461,28 @@ nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp,
>   	if (fp->fi_had_conflict)
>   		return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
>   
> -	if (open->op_share_access & NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE) {
> -		nf = find_writeable_file(fp);
> +	/*
> +	 * Try for a write delegation first. We need an O_RDWR file
> +	 * since a write delegation allows the client to perform any open
> +	 * from its cache.
> +	 */
> +	if ((open->op_share_access & NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH) == NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH) {
> +		nf = nfsd_file_get(fp->fi_fds[O_RDWR]);
>   		dl_type = NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE;
> -	} else {

Does this mean OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE do not get a write delegation?
It does not seem right.

-Dai

> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the file is being opened O_RDONLY or we couldn't get a O_RDWR
> +	 * file for some reason, then try for a read deleg instead.
> +	 */
> +	if (!nf && (open->op_share_access & NFS4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ)) {
>   		nf = find_readable_file(fp);
>   		dl_type = NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_READ;
>   	}
> -	if (!nf) {
> -		/*
> -		 * We probably could attempt another open and get a read
> -		 * delegation, but for now, don't bother until the
> -		 * client actually sends us one.
> -		 */
> +
> +	if (!nf)
>   		return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
> -	}
> +
>   	spin_lock(&state_lock);
>   	spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
>   	if (nfs4_delegation_exists(clp, fp))
>
> ---
> base-commit: a734662572708cf062e974f659ae50c24fc1ad17
> change-id: 20230731-wdeleg-bbdb6b25a3c6
>
> Best regards,