linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cxl/mbox: Add handle to event processing debug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZMqEY2qj8s8uKZlN@aschofie-mobl2>
Date:   Wed, 2 Aug 2023 09:29:23 -0700
From:   Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cxl/mbox: Add handle to event processing debug

On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 01:13:29PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Knowing which handle is being processed helped in debugging new event
> code.  Add a dev_dbg() message with this information.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> index a1c490f66bbf..f052d5f174ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> @@ -947,9 +947,13 @@ static void cxl_mem_get_records_log(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds,
>  		if (!nr_rec)
>  			break;
>  
> -		for (i = 0; i < nr_rec; i++)
> +		for (i = 0; i < nr_rec; i++) {
> +			dev_dbg(dev, "Event log %d: processing handle %u\n",
> +				type,
> +				le16_to_cpu(payload->records[i].hdr.handle));
>  			cxl_event_trace_record(cxlmd, type,
>  					       &payload->records[i]);
> +		}

Is dev_dbg() overkill when the info is in the trace event?

>  
>  		if (payload->flags & CXL_GET_EVENT_FLAG_OVERFLOW)
>  			trace_cxl_overflow(cxlmd, type, payload);
> 
> -- 
> 2.41.0
>