[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230802172030.GEZMqQXmeb98Tm+Qhg@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 19:20:30 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] [RESEND] x86: avoid unneeded __div64_32 function
definition
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 10:48:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Right, makes sense. How about this version?
>
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ static inline u64 mul_u32_u32(u32 a, u32 b)
> }
> #define mul_u32_u32 mul_u32_u32
>
> +/*
> + * __div64_32() is never called on x86, so prevent the
> + * generic definition from getting built.
> + */
> +#define __div64_32
>
> #else
> # include <asm-generic/div64.h>
Yap.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists