linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] [RESEND] x86: qspinlock-paravirt: fix mising-prototype warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230802172612.GFZMqRtDOGd28DNe03@fat_crate.local>
Date:   Wed, 2 Aug 2023 19:26:12 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] [RESEND] x86: qspinlock-paravirt: fix
 mising-prototype warnings

On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 10:26:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The variant below would avoid adding more #ifdefs, by moving
> the declaration into asm/paravirt.h to ensure that it's
> declared even if there is no caller.
> 
> Does this look better to you?

Yes, thanks. I don't mind empty stubs in the header which the compiler
discards/ignores.

Now lemme look at the rest.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette