linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] riscv: Correct the MODULES

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Aug 2023 01:05:23 +0000
From:   Song Shuai <suagrfillet@...il.com>
To:     Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
        palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sergey.matyukevich@...tacore.com,
        david@...hat.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
        panqinglin2020@...as.ac.cn, woodrow.shen@...ive.com,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Correct the MODULES_VADDR

Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> 于2023年8月1日周二 23:20写道：
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 8:05 AM Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Song,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 1:10 PM Song Shuai <suagrfillet@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > As Documentation/riscv/vm-layout.rst describes, the 2G-sized "modules, BPF"
> > > area should lie right before the "kernel" area. But the current definition
> > > of MODULES_VADDR isn't consistent with that, so correct it.
> > >
> > > Before this patch, the size of "modules" from print_vm_layout() is not 2G.
> > >
> > > [    0.000000]      modules : 0xffffffff2ff2f000 - 0xffffffffae600000 (2022 MB)
> > > [    0.000000]       lowmem : 0xff60000000000000 - 0xff60000040000000 (1024 MB)
> > > [    0.000000]       kernel : 0xffffffffae600000 - 0xffffffffffffffff (1305 MB)
> > >
> > > After this patch, the size is 2G.
> > >
> > > [    0.000000]      modules : 0xffffffff3a000000 - 0xffffffffba000000 (2048 MB)
> > > [    0.000000]       lowmem : 0xff60000000000000 - 0xff60000040000000 (1024 MB)
> > > [    0.000000]       kernel : 0xffffffffba000000 - 0xffffffffffffffff (1119 MB)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Song Shuai <suagrfillet@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > index 75970ee2bda2..7c57e17fc758 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > @@ -53,8 +53,8 @@
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > >  /* This is used to define the end of the KASAN shadow region */
> > >  #define MODULES_LOWEST_VADDR   (KERNEL_LINK_ADDR - SZ_2G)
> > > -#define MODULES_VADDR          (PFN_ALIGN((unsigned long)&_end) - SZ_2G)
> > >  #define MODULES_END            (PFN_ALIGN((unsigned long)&_start))
> > > +#define MODULES_VADDR          (MODULES_END - SZ_2G)
> > >  #endif
> > >
> > >  /*
> > > --
> > > 2.20.1
> > >
> >
> > The documentation is approximative, the modules must stay within a 2GB
> > window to *all* the kernel symbols, hence the __end - 2G, not __start.
> Thus, the ftrace detour trampoline could cover all kernel symbols.
>
That's another view to help me understand the definition of
MODULES_VADDR,Thanks.
> --
> Best Regards
>  Guo Ren



-- 
Thanks,
Song