linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: Clean up errors in smu73

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Aug 2023 08:06:51 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ran Sun <sunran001@...suo.com>, alexander.deucher@....com,
        airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch
Cc:     amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: Clean up errors in smu73_discrete.h

On 01/08/2023 18:34, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2023, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote:
>> And it is unfortunate that you and @208suo.com people doesn't reply to
>> review comments (try searching lore.kernel.org)
> 
> Essentially a one-way firehose of patches pointed at our general
> direction is not benefitial to the community. It's not participation,
> it's not co-operation. If the review gets ignored, why should we invest
> our time on *any* of the patches?
> 
> 

Well, I guess this is the kind of "hey, some new orgs spam us tens
of trivial patches, then we review them as usual, but people from
that org are deaf in regards of our reviews (maybe deliberately?)".
The exact same situation happened last year with @cdjrlc.com
people, when they were notoriously known for spell-fixing and
redundant word fixing patches. Many of these patches were correct,
but some of them were not, triggering reviews requesting changes.
Yet, they also ignore the reviews.

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara