linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: Clean up errors in smu73

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87o7jpvjq8.fsf@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 02 Aug 2023 13:09:35 +0300
From:   Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
        Ran Sun <sunran001@...suo.com>, alexander.deucher@....com,
        airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch
Cc:     amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: Clean up errors in smu73_discrete.h

On Wed, 02 Aug 2023, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote:
> On 01/08/2023 18:34, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 01 Aug 2023, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote:
>>> And it is unfortunate that you and @208suo.com people doesn't reply to
>>> review comments (try searching lore.kernel.org)
>> 
>> Essentially a one-way firehose of patches pointed at our general
>> direction is not benefitial to the community. It's not participation,
>> it's not co-operation. If the review gets ignored, why should we invest
>> our time on *any* of the patches?
>> 
>> 
>
> Well, I guess this is the kind of "hey, some new orgs spam us tens
> of trivial patches, then we review them as usual, but people from
> that org are deaf in regards of our reviews (maybe deliberately?)".
> The exact same situation happened last year with @cdjrlc.com
> people, when they were notoriously known for spell-fixing and
> redundant word fixing patches. Many of these patches were correct,
> but some of them were not, triggering reviews requesting changes.
> Yet, they also ignore the reviews.

Since these emails, there have been 50+ more individual patches. :(

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center