[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230802092856.819328-1-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 17:28:56 +0800
From: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...fujitsu.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ying.huang@...el.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com,
Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH] acpi,mm: fix typo sibiling -> sibling
First found this typo as reviewing memory tier code. Fix it by sed like:
$ sed -i 's/sibiling/sibling/g' $(git grep -l sibiling)
so the acpi one will be corrected as well.
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...fujitsu.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c | 2 +-
include/linux/memory-tiers.h | 2 +-
mm/memory-tiers.c | 10 +++++-----
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
index 7a453c5ff303..7f073ca64f0e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static void round_robin_cpu(unsigned int tsk_index)
for_each_cpu(cpu, pad_busy_cpus)
cpumask_or(tmp, tmp, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));
cpumask_andnot(tmp, cpu_online_mask, tmp);
- /* avoid HT sibilings if possible */
+ /* avoid HT siblings if possible */
if (cpumask_empty(tmp))
cpumask_andnot(tmp, cpu_online_mask, pad_busy_cpus);
if (cpumask_empty(tmp)) {
diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
index fc9647b1b4f9..1e6c8ddcaa92 100644
--- a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
+++ b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
struct memory_tier;
struct memory_dev_type {
/* list of memory types that are part of same tier as this type */
- struct list_head tier_sibiling;
+ struct list_head tier_sibling;
/* abstract distance for this specific memory type */
int adistance;
/* Nodes of same abstract distance */
diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
index a516e303e304..56c22470c96d 100644
--- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
+++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static __always_inline nodemask_t get_memtier_nodemask(struct memory_tier *memti
nodemask_t nodes = NODE_MASK_NONE;
struct memory_dev_type *memtype;
- list_for_each_entry(memtype, &memtier->memory_types, tier_sibiling)
+ list_for_each_entry(memtype, &memtier->memory_types, tier_sibling)
nodes_or(nodes, nodes, memtype->nodes);
return nodes;
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static struct memory_tier *find_create_memory_tier(struct memory_dev_type *memty
* If the memtype is already part of a memory tier,
* just return that.
*/
- if (!list_empty(&memtype->tier_sibiling)) {
+ if (!list_empty(&memtype->tier_sibling)) {
list_for_each_entry(memtier, &memory_tiers, list) {
if (adistance == memtier->adistance_start)
return memtier;
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static struct memory_tier *find_create_memory_tier(struct memory_dev_type *memty
memtier = new_memtier;
link_memtype:
- list_add(&memtype->tier_sibiling, &memtier->memory_types);
+ list_add(&memtype->tier_sibling, &memtier->memory_types);
return memtier;
}
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static bool clear_node_memory_tier(int node)
memtype = node_memory_types[node].memtype;
node_clear(node, memtype->nodes);
if (nodes_empty(memtype->nodes)) {
- list_del_init(&memtype->tier_sibiling);
+ list_del_init(&memtype->tier_sibling);
if (list_empty(&memtier->memory_types))
destroy_memory_tier(memtier);
}
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ struct memory_dev_type *alloc_memory_type(int adistance)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
memtype->adistance = adistance;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memtype->tier_sibiling);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memtype->tier_sibling);
memtype->nodes = NODE_MASK_NONE;
kref_init(&memtype->kref);
return memtype;
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists