linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] acpi,mm: fix typo sibiling -> sibling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jY87yCjmFv2HsJ1ZuDF_9bXW0iM5rqGJdY1DhkEuRdfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2023 19:42:20 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
        aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi,mm: fix typo sibiling -> sibling

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 11:30 AM Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> First found this typo as reviewing memory tier code. Fix it by sed like:
> $ sed -i 's/sibiling/sibling/g' $(git grep -l sibiling)
>
> so the acpi one will be corrected as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...fujitsu.com>

Please post the ACPI and mm changes as separate patches.

Thanks!

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c      |  2 +-
>  include/linux/memory-tiers.h |  2 +-
>  mm/memory-tiers.c            | 10 +++++-----
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> index 7a453c5ff303..7f073ca64f0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static void round_robin_cpu(unsigned int tsk_index)
>         for_each_cpu(cpu, pad_busy_cpus)
>                 cpumask_or(tmp, tmp, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));
>         cpumask_andnot(tmp, cpu_online_mask, tmp);
> -       /* avoid HT sibilings if possible */
> +       /* avoid HT siblings if possible */
>         if (cpumask_empty(tmp))
>                 cpumask_andnot(tmp, cpu_online_mask, pad_busy_cpus);
>         if (cpumask_empty(tmp)) {
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> index fc9647b1b4f9..1e6c8ddcaa92 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
>  struct memory_tier;
>  struct memory_dev_type {
>         /* list of memory types that are part of same tier as this type */
> -       struct list_head tier_sibiling;
> +       struct list_head tier_sibling;
>         /* abstract distance for this specific memory type */
>         int adistance;
>         /* Nodes of same abstract distance */
> diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> index a516e303e304..56c22470c96d 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static __always_inline nodemask_t get_memtier_nodemask(struct memory_tier *memti
>         nodemask_t nodes = NODE_MASK_NONE;
>         struct memory_dev_type *memtype;
>
> -       list_for_each_entry(memtype, &memtier->memory_types, tier_sibiling)
> +       list_for_each_entry(memtype, &memtier->memory_types, tier_sibling)
>                 nodes_or(nodes, nodes, memtype->nodes);
>
>         return nodes;
> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static struct memory_tier *find_create_memory_tier(struct memory_dev_type *memty
>          * If the memtype is already part of a memory tier,
>          * just return that.
>          */
> -       if (!list_empty(&memtype->tier_sibiling)) {
> +       if (!list_empty(&memtype->tier_sibling)) {
>                 list_for_each_entry(memtier, &memory_tiers, list) {
>                         if (adistance == memtier->adistance_start)
>                                 return memtier;
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static struct memory_tier *find_create_memory_tier(struct memory_dev_type *memty
>         memtier = new_memtier;
>
>  link_memtype:
> -       list_add(&memtype->tier_sibiling, &memtier->memory_types);
> +       list_add(&memtype->tier_sibling, &memtier->memory_types);
>         return memtier;
>  }
>
> @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static bool clear_node_memory_tier(int node)
>                 memtype = node_memory_types[node].memtype;
>                 node_clear(node, memtype->nodes);
>                 if (nodes_empty(memtype->nodes)) {
> -                       list_del_init(&memtype->tier_sibiling);
> +                       list_del_init(&memtype->tier_sibling);
>                         if (list_empty(&memtier->memory_types))
>                                 destroy_memory_tier(memtier);
>                 }
> @@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ struct memory_dev_type *alloc_memory_type(int adistance)
>                 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
>         memtype->adistance = adistance;
> -       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memtype->tier_sibiling);
> +       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memtype->tier_sibling);
>         memtype->nodes  = NODE_MASK_NONE;
>         kref_init(&memtype->kref);
>         return memtype;
> --
> 2.31.1
>