[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0acd286d-d4f4-97b2-c296-b2860a00def6@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 12:41:00 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: CK Hu (胡俊光) <ck.hu@...iatek.com>,
"chunkuang.hu@...nel.org" <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
Cc: "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>,
"wenst@...omium.org" <wenst@...omium.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/mediatek: Dynamically allocate CMDQ and use
helper functions
Il 02/08/23 08:24, CK Hu (胡俊光) ha scritto:
> Hi, Angelo:
>
> On Fri, 2023-06-23 at 11:49 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>
>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
>> you have verified the sender or the content.
>> Instead of stack allocating the cmdq_client and cmdq_handle
>> structures
>> switch them to pointers, allowing us to migrate this driver to use
>> the
>> common functions provided by mtk-cmdq-helper.
>> In order to do this, it was also necessary to add a `priv` pointer to
>> struct cmdq_client, as that's used to pass (in this case) a mtk_crtc
>> handle to the ddp_cmdq_cb() mailbox RX callback function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
>> angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 107 +++++++---------------
>> --
>> include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
>> index 0df62b076f49..b63289ab6787 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
>> @@ -50,8 +50,8 @@ struct mtk_drm_crtc {
>> bool pending_async_planes;
>>
>> #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ)
>> - struct cmdq_client cmdq_client;
>> - struct cmdq_pkt cmdq_handle;
>> + struct cmdq_client *cmdq_client;
>> + struct cmdq_pkt *cmdq_handle;
>> u32 cmdq_event;
>> u32 cmdq_vblank_cnt;
>> wait_queue_head_t cb_blocking_queue;
>> @@ -108,47 +108,6 @@ static void mtk_drm_finish_page_flip(struct
>> mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ)
>> -static int mtk_drm_cmdq_pkt_create(struct cmdq_client *client,
>> struct cmdq_pkt *pkt,
>> - size_t size)
>> -{
>> - struct device *dev;
>> - dma_addr_t dma_addr;
>> -
>> - pkt->va_base = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> - if (!pkt->va_base) {
>> - kfree(pkt);
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> - }
>> - pkt->buf_size = size;
>> - pkt->cl = (void *)client;
>
> I have a plan to remove cl in struct cmdq_pkt. But this modification
> would make this plan more difficult. So I would pending this patch
> until cl is removed from struct cmdq_pkt.
>
I think that this ifdef cleanup is more urgent than the removal of `cl` from
struct cmdq_pkt, as those ifdefs shouldn't have reached upstream in the first
place, don't you agree?
Regards,
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists