| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20230802123824.15301-1-dg573847474@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 12:38:24 +0000
From: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
To: mark@...heh.com, jlbec@...lplan.org, joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ocfs2: cluster: fix potential deadlock on &qs->qs_lock
&qs->qs_lock is acquired by timer o2net_idle_timer() along the following
call chain. Thus the acquisition of the lock under process context should
disable bottom half, otherwise deadlock could happen if the timer happens
to preempt the execution while the lock is held in process context on the
same CPU.
<timer interrupt>
-> o2net_idle_timer()
-> o2quo_conn_err()
-> spin_lock(&qs->qs_lock)
Several lock acquisition of &qs->qs_lock under process contex do not
disable irq or bottom half. The patch fixes these potential deadlocks
scenerio by using spin_lock_bh() on &qs->qs_lock.
This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am
developing for irq-related deadlock. x86_64 allmodconfig using gcc shows
no new warning.
Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
Changes in v2
- Consistently use spin_lock_bh() on all potential deadlock sites of
&qs->qs_lock
---
fs/ocfs2/cluster/quorum.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/cluster/quorum.c b/fs/ocfs2/cluster/quorum.c
index 189c111bc371..15d0ed9c13e5 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/cluster/quorum.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/cluster/quorum.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void o2quo_make_decision(struct work_struct *work)
int lowest_hb, lowest_reachable = 0, fence = 0;
struct o2quo_state *qs = &o2quo_state;
- spin_lock(&qs->qs_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&qs->qs_lock);
lowest_hb = find_first_bit(qs->qs_hb_bm, O2NM_MAX_NODES);
if (lowest_hb != O2NM_MAX_NODES)
@@ -146,14 +146,14 @@ static void o2quo_make_decision(struct work_struct *work)
out:
if (fence) {
- spin_unlock(&qs->qs_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&qs->qs_lock);
o2quo_fence_self();
} else {
mlog(ML_NOTICE, "not fencing this node, heartbeating: %d, "
"connected: %d, lowest: %d (%sreachable)\n",
qs->qs_heartbeating, qs->qs_connected, lowest_hb,
lowest_reachable ? "" : "un");
- spin_unlock(&qs->qs_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&qs->qs_lock);
}
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ void o2quo_hb_up(u8 node)
{
struct o2quo_state *qs = &o2quo_state;
- spin_lock(&qs->qs_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&qs->qs_lock);
qs->qs_heartbeating++;
mlog_bug_on_msg(qs->qs_heartbeating == O2NM_MAX_NODES,
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ void o2quo_hb_up(u8 node)
else
o2quo_clear_hold(qs, node);
- spin_unlock(&qs->qs_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&qs->qs_lock);
}
/* hb going down releases any holds we might have had due to this node from
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ void o2quo_hb_down(u8 node)
{
struct o2quo_state *qs = &o2quo_state;
- spin_lock(&qs->qs_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&qs->qs_lock);
qs->qs_heartbeating--;
mlog_bug_on_msg(qs->qs_heartbeating < 0,
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ void o2quo_hb_down(u8 node)
o2quo_clear_hold(qs, node);
- spin_unlock(&qs->qs_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&qs->qs_lock);
}
/* this tells us that we've decided that the node is still heartbeating
@@ -245,14 +245,14 @@ void o2quo_hb_still_up(u8 node)
{
struct o2quo_state *qs = &o2quo_state;
- spin_lock(&qs->qs_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&qs->qs_lock);
mlog(0, "node %u\n", node);
qs->qs_pending = 1;
o2quo_clear_hold(qs, node);
- spin_unlock(&qs->qs_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&qs->qs_lock);
}
/* This is analogous to hb_up. as a node's connection comes up we delay the
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ void o2quo_conn_up(u8 node)
{
struct o2quo_state *qs = &o2quo_state;
- spin_lock(&qs->qs_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&qs->qs_lock);
qs->qs_connected++;
mlog_bug_on_msg(qs->qs_connected == O2NM_MAX_NODES,
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ void o2quo_conn_up(u8 node)
else
o2quo_clear_hold(qs, node);
- spin_unlock(&qs->qs_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&qs->qs_lock);
}
/* we've decided that we won't ever be connecting to the node again. if it's
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ void o2quo_conn_err(u8 node)
{
struct o2quo_state *qs = &o2quo_state;
- spin_lock(&qs->qs_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&qs->qs_lock);
if (test_bit(node, qs->qs_conn_bm)) {
qs->qs_connected--;
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ void o2quo_conn_err(u8 node)
mlog(0, "node %u, %d total\n", node, qs->qs_connected);
- spin_unlock(&qs->qs_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&qs->qs_lock);
}
void o2quo_init(void)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists