[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f339913a-3f73-5fc3-27d1-73491a8028a7@wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 19:07:04 +0000
From: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>
To: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@...aspace.dk>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
CC: "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"gost.dev@...sung.com" <gost.dev@...sung.com>,
"open list:BLOCK LAYER" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans Holmberg <Hans.Holmberg@....com>,
Matias Bjørling <Matias.Bjorling@....com>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>,
Aravind Ramesh <Aravind.Ramesh@....com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/3] ublk: enable zoned storage support
On 03.08.23 16:09, Andreas Hindborg (Samsung) wrote:
> + buf = __vmalloc(bufsize, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY);
Missing #include <linux/vmalloc.h> so the bot doesn't complain.
But while we're at it, why can't you just use kvmalloc() here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists