[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZMy+dTpJzln7DlgZ@ovpn-8-25.pek2.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 17:01:41 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: "Andreas Hindborg (Samsung)" <nmi@...aspace.dk>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, gost.dev@...sung.com,
"open list:BLOCK LAYER" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans Holmberg <Hans.Holmberg@....com>,
Matias Bjorling <Matias.Bjorling@....com>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>,
Aravind Ramesh <Aravind.Ramesh@....com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/3] ublk: move check for empty address field on
command submission
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 04:07:00PM +0200, Andreas Hindborg (Samsung) wrote:
> From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>
>
> In preparation for zoned storage support, move the check for empty `addr`
> field into the command handler case statement. Note that the check makes no
> sense for `UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA` because the `addr` field must always be
> set for this command.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index db3523e281a6..5a1ee17636ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -1419,11 +1419,6 @@ static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> ^ (_IOC_NR(cmd_op) == UBLK_IO_NEED_GET_DATA))
> goto out;
>
> - if (ublk_support_user_copy(ubq) && ub_cmd->addr) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> ret = ublk_check_cmd_op(cmd_op);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> @@ -1452,6 +1447,12 @@ static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + /* User copy requires addr to be unset */
> + if (ublk_support_user_copy(ubq) && ub_cmd->addr) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
Given you have to post v11 for fixing build issue, please convert the
above two 'if' into one 'if else':
if (!ublk_support_user_copy(ubq)) {
/*
* FETCH_RQ has to provide IO buffer if NEED GET
* DATA is not enabled
*/
if (!ub_cmd->addr && !ublk_need_get_data(ubq))
goto out;
} else {
if (ub_cmd->addr) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
}
> ublk_fill_io_cmd(io, cmd, ub_cmd->addr);
> ublk_mark_io_ready(ub, ubq);
> break;
> @@ -1470,6 +1471,13 @@ static int __ublk_ch_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> req_op(req) == REQ_OP_READ))
> goto out;
> }
> +
> + /* User copy requires addr to be unset */
> + if (ublk_support_user_copy(ubq) && ub_cmd->addr) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
Same with above.
BTW, I have verified this patchset with ublk-zoned example in
libublk-rs:
https://github.com/ming1/libublk-rs/tree/zoned.v2
cargo run --example zoned -- add -1 10240
mkfs.btrfs -O zoned /dev/ublkb0
mount & git clone linux-kernel &umount
Hope V11 can be merged.
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists