[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <106602d4-fff5-be88-a265-847e9edf8097@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 09:36:08 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] arm_pmu: acpi: Add a representative platform
device for TRBE
On 8/2/23 15:41, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 02/08/2023 02:07, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/1/23 20:21, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 03:10:50PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>>>> index a0801f68762b..7ec26d21303d 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>>>> @@ -187,5 +187,6 @@ void armpmu_free_irq(int irq, int cpu);
>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_PMU */
>>>> #define ARMV8_SPE_PDEV_NAME "arm,spe-v1"
>>>> +#define ARMV8_TRBE_PDEV_NAME "arm-trbe-acpi"
>>>
>>> Why is the TRBE name formatted differently to the SPE one?
>>
>> Nothing specific, although "arm,spe-v1" seemed more like a DT naming
>> scheme. But could change the name as "arm,trbe-v1" to be in sync with
>> SPE here.
>
> Do we really need v1 ? I would leave it as arm,trbe
Sure, will make it 'arm,trbe' instead.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists