[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230803075135.499536-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2023 15:51:35 +0800
From:   Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <tj@...nel.org>, <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] workqueue: use LIST_HEAD to initialize cull_list
Use LIST_HEAD() to initialize cull_list instead of open-coding it.
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 3ddd0d599dab..ae975a7c9f69 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2307,9 +2307,8 @@ static void idle_worker_timeout(struct timer_list *t)
 static void idle_cull_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct worker_pool *pool = container_of(work, struct worker_pool, idle_cull_work);
-	struct list_head cull_list;
+	LIST_HEAD(cull_list);
 
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cull_list);
 	/*
 	 * Grabbing wq_pool_attach_mutex here ensures an already-running worker
 	 * cannot proceed beyong worker_detach_from_pool() in its self-destruct
@@ -3875,10 +3874,8 @@ static void rcu_free_pool(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
 {
 	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(detach_completion);
-	struct list_head cull_list;
 	struct worker *worker;
-
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cull_list);
+	LIST_HEAD(cull_list);
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
-- 
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
