[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230803085342.GG212435@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 10:53:42 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ze Gao <zegao@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 3/5] sched, tracing: reorganize fields of switch
event struct
On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 04:33:50AM -0400, Ze Gao wrote:
> Report prioritiy and prev_state in 'short' to save some buffer
> space. And also reorder the fields so that we take struct
> alignment into consideration to make the record compact.
>
> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ze Gao <zegao@...cent.com>
I am really getting fed up with this. This again doesn't list any
reasons on why this is a sane thing to do.
Please review past discussions and collate the various things mentioned
into this Changelog.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists