[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a59cb5df-ad95-61d8-b93c-ca993651f82f@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 18:57:48 +0800
From: Li Zetao <lizetao1@...wei.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] romfs: only select BUFFER_HEAD for the block based path
Hi Christoph,
On 2023/8/4 18:26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> selecting BUFFER_HEAD unconditionally does not work as romfs can also
> be built with only the MTD backend and thus without CONFIG_BLOCK.
>
> Fixes: 0f842210d97a ("fs/Kconfig: Fix compile error for romfs")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
> fs/romfs/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/romfs/Kconfig b/fs/romfs/Kconfig
> index 3f6b550eee6192..f24a96a331af1b 100644
> --- a/fs/romfs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/romfs/Kconfig
> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> config ROMFS_FS
> tristate "ROM file system support"
> depends on BLOCK || MTD
> - select BUFFER_HEAD
> help
> This is a very small read-only file system mainly intended for
> initial ram disks of installation disks, but it could be used for
> @@ -58,6 +57,7 @@ endchoice
> config ROMFS_ON_BLOCK
> bool
> default y if ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BLOCK || ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BOTH
> + select BUFFER_HEAD
>
> config ROMFS_ON_MTD
> bool
I have tested the patch on my environment and it resolves the two
compile errors reported by kernel test robot. The links are as follows:
Link1:
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308031810.pQzGmR1v-lkp@intel.com/
Link2:
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308041329.6SK97Asr-lkp@intel.com/
Tested-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@...wei.com>
Thanks,
Li Zetao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists