[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230804103805.GA23794@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 12:38:05 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, lizetao1@...wei.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] romfs: only select BUFFER_HEAD for the block based path
Sorry, this should be:
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
to match the signoff. I managed to mess my mail setup, but it should
be fixed now.
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 12:26:48PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> selecting BUFFER_HEAD unconditionally does not work as romfs can also
> be built with only the MTD backend and thus without CONFIG_BLOCK.
>
> Fixes: 0f842210d97a ("fs/Kconfig: Fix compile error for romfs")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
> fs/romfs/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/romfs/Kconfig b/fs/romfs/Kconfig
> index 3f6b550eee6192..f24a96a331af1b 100644
> --- a/fs/romfs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/romfs/Kconfig
> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> config ROMFS_FS
> tristate "ROM file system support"
> depends on BLOCK || MTD
> - select BUFFER_HEAD
> help
> This is a very small read-only file system mainly intended for
> initial ram disks of installation disks, but it could be used for
> @@ -58,6 +57,7 @@ endchoice
> config ROMFS_ON_BLOCK
> bool
> default y if ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BLOCK || ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BOTH
> + select BUFFER_HEAD
>
> config ROMFS_ON_MTD
> bool
> --
> 2.39.2
---end quoted text---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists