[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d311099-a93e-4270-e78f-a464b7fcaa34@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 20:09:41 +0530
From: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@...com>
To: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>, <nm@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>,
<kristo@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<t-konduru@...com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-evm: Correct Pin mux offset
for ospi
Hi Udit,
On 02/08/23 17:11, Udit Kumar wrote:
> After splitting wkup_pmx pin mux for J784S4 into four regions.
> Pin mux offset for OSPI nodes were not updated to align with new
> regions, due to this while setting ospi pin muxes out of range
> error was seen.
>
> Pin mux offsets for OSPI nodes are corrected in this patch.
>
> Fixes: 14462bd0b247 ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4: Fix wakeup pinmux range and pinctrl node offsets")
> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>
> ---
> Logs
> https://gist.github.com/uditkumarti/f3b1a5402f7202931a4b905f7d331502
>
> Please apply patch https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230721082654.27036-1-tony@atomide.com/
> before this
>
> Change log:
>
> Change in v2
> Changed name of pin mux to align with
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230721082654.27036-1-tony@atomide.com/ patch
>
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230801141920.3317697-1-u-kumar1@ti.com/
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-evm.dts | 29 +++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-evm.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-evm.dts
> index 7ad152a1b90f..d594d233af87 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-evm.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j784s4-evm.dts
> @@ -379,21 +379,28 @@ J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x020, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (D34) MCU_OSPI0_D5 */
> J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x024, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (E34) MCU_OSPI0_D6 */
> J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x028, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (E33) MCU_OSPI0_D7 */
> J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x008, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (C34) MCU_OSPI0_DQS */
> - J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x03c, PIN_OUTPUT, 6) /* (C32) MCU_OSPI0_CSn3.MCU_OSPI0_ECC_FAIL */
> - J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x038, PIN_OUTPUT, 6) /* (B34) MCU_OSPI0_CSn2.MCU_OSPI0_RESET_OUT0 */
> + >;
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&wkup_pmx1 {
> + mcu_fss0_ospi0_1_pins_default: mcu-fss0-ospi0-1-default-pins {
> + pinctrl-single,pins = <
> + J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x004, PIN_OUTPUT, 6) /* (C32) MCU_OSPI0_ECC_FAIL */
> + J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x000, PIN_OUTPUT, 6) /* (B34) MCU_OSPI0_RESET_OUT0 */
> >;
> };
>
> mcu_fss0_ospi1_pins_default: mcu-fss0-ospi1-default-pins {
> pinctrl-single,pins = <
> - J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x040, PIN_OUTPUT, 0) /* (F32) MCU_OSPI1_CLK */
> - J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x05c, PIN_OUTPUT, 0) /* (G32) MCU_OSPI1_CSn0 */
> - J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x04c, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (E35) MCU_OSPI1_D0 */
> - J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x050, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (D31) MCU_OSPI1_D1 */
> - J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x054, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (G31) MCU_OSPI1_D2 */
> - J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x058, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (F33) MCU_OSPI1_D3 */
> - J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x048, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (F31) MCU_OSPI1_DQS */
> - J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x044, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (C31) MCU_OSPI1_LBCLKO */
> + J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x008, PIN_OUTPUT, 0) /* (F32) MCU_OSPI1_CLK */
> + J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x024, PIN_OUTPUT, 0) /* (G32) MCU_OSPI1_CSn0 */
> + J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x014, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (E35) MCU_OSPI1_D0 */
> + J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x018, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (D31) MCU_OSPI1_D1 */
> + J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x01C, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (G31) MCU_OSPI1_D2 */
> + J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x020, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (F33) MCU_OSPI1_D3 */
> + J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x010, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (F31) MCU_OSPI1_DQS */
> + J784S4_WKUP_IOPAD(0x00C, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (C31) MCU_OSPI1_LBCLKO */
Thank you for the patch,
For OSPI functionality:
Tested-by: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@...com>
before: https://gist.github.com/vaishnavachath/c87275e53f6ae38bacc44c65ed09c733
(QSPI probe fails due to wrong pinmux)
after: https://gist.github.com/vaishnavachath/b5f6147cfae5218815aca94ec0dfd991
(both QSPI, OSPI is functional)
heads-up :
I see the following warnings for ADC:
```
pinctrl-single 4301c068.pinctrl: mux offset out of range: 0x134 (0x120)
pinctrl-single 4301c068.pinctrl: could not add functions for
mcu-adc0-default-pins 308x
pinctrl-single 4301c068.pinctrl: mux offset out of range: 0x154 (0x120)
pinctrl-single 4301c068.pinctrl: could not add functions for
mcu-adc1-default-pins 340x
```
mcu_adc0_pins_default and mcu_adc1_pins_default entries needs to have the
wkup_pmx2 base (0x68) subtracted to get the appropriate offsets, not sure if
there is already a patch addressing the same or should be part of this patch.
Thanks and Regards,
Vaishnav
> >;
> };
> };
> @@ -437,7 +444,7 @@ &fss {
> &ospi0 {
> status = "okay";
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> - pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_fss0_ospi0_pins_default>;
> + pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_fss0_ospi0_pins_default>, <&mcu_fss0_ospi0_1_pins_default>;
>
> flash@0 {
> compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
Powered by blists - more mailing lists