[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca0a7c5c-d098-743b-eee4-fa341b10c6a8@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 10:34:40 -0500
From: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
To: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65: Enable TSCADC nodes at the
board level
On 8/7/23 12:51 AM, Dhruva Gole wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> On 03/08/23 02:23, Andrew Davis wrote:
>> TSCADC nodes defined in the top-level AM65 SoC dtsi files are incomplete
>> and may not be functional unless they are extended with pinmux and/or
>> device information.
>>
>> Disable the TSCADC nodes in the dtsi files and only enable the ones that
>> are actually pinned out on a given board.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi | 5 +----
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-mcu.dtsi | 2 ++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-base-board.dts | 2 ++
>> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi
>> index 6041862d5aa75..ba1c14a54acf4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi
>> @@ -582,11 +582,8 @@ &mcu_spi0 {
>> ti,pindir-d0-out-d1-in;
>> };
>> -&tscadc0 {
>> - status = "disabled";
>> -};
>> -
>> &tscadc1 {
>> + status = "okay";
>
> The commit body says,
> "Disable the TSCADC nodes in the dtsi files"
>
> Please can we also provide some explanation on why
> tscadc1 was left as okay here in a dtsi file?
>
Same reasoning as in my response for patch [4/13], the node
is complete at this point, so we enable it here.
The commit message is a bit off given these boards do their
pinmuxing in the .dtsi files, not at the last level .dts files
like most boards, but I kept the commit message consistent for
the whole series as this is a rare exception case. I can change
the message wording if you would like.
Andrew
>> adc {
>> ti,adc-channels = <0 1 2 3 4 5>;
>> };
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-mcu.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-mcu.dtsi
>> index 2c9c20a9d9179..4defde540fe0b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-mcu.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-mcu.dtsi
>> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ tscadc0: tscadc@...00000 {
>> dmas = <&mcu_udmap 0x7100>,
>> <&mcu_udmap 0x7101 >;
>> dma-names = "fifo0", "fifo1";
>> + status = "disabled";
>> adc {
>> #io-channel-cells = <1>;
>> @@ -130,6 +131,7 @@ tscadc1: tscadc@...10000 {
>> dmas = <&mcu_udmap 0x7102>,
>> <&mcu_udmap 0x7103>;
>> dma-names = "fifo0", "fifo1";
>> + status = "disabled";
>> adc {
>> #io-channel-cells = <1>;
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-base-board.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-base-board.dts
>> index 43de7c132d343..17f45a9f7b146 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-base-board.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-base-board.dts
>> @@ -478,12 +478,14 @@ &usb0_phy {
>> };
>> &tscadc0 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> adc {
>> ti,adc-channels = <0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7>;
>> };
>> };
>> &tscadc1 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> adc {
>> ti,adc-channels = <0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7>;
>> };
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists