[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a9e443c7-c7b5-63ce-08d9-5604ac545bf6@alu.unizg.hr>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 20:28:04 +0200
From: Mirsad Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>,
Tianfei Zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4.14 1/1] test_firmware: fix the memory leaks with the
reqs buffer
On 8/7/23 11:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 07:00:18PM +0200, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
>> [ commit be37bed754ed90b2655382f93f9724b3c1aae847 upstream ]
>>
>> Dan Carpenter spotted that test_fw_config->reqs will be leaked if
>> trigger_batched_requests_store() is called two or more times.
>> The same appears with trigger_batched_requests_async_store().
>>
>> This bug wasn't triggered by the tests, but observed by Dan's visual
>> inspection of the code.
>>
>> The recommended workaround was to return -EBUSY if test_fw_config->reqs
>> is already allocated.
>>
>> Fixes: c92316bf8e94 ("test_firmware: add batched firmware tests")
>> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>> Cc: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>
>> Cc: Tianfei Zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>
>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
>> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>> Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.14
>> Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
>> Suggested-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509084746.48259-2-mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr
>> Signed-off-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>
>>
>> [ This fix is applied against the 4.14 stable branch. There are no changes to the ]
>> [ fix in code when compared to the upstread, only the reformatting for backport. ]
>
> Thanks for all of these, now queued up.
No problem, I should have done it right the first time to reduce your load.
I really believe that backporting bug fix patches is important because many systems
cannot upgrade because of the legacy apps and hardware, to state the obvious.
I know because we are in that group. :-)
Kind regards,
Mirsad Todorovac
Powered by blists - more mailing lists