[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3cf952f-7011-a597-57a0-756cbc5b91ce@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 10:07:56 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>
Cc: "jaegeuk@...nel.org" <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: clean up w/ sbi->log_sectors_per_block
On 2023/8/4 17:43, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> On May 23, 2023 / 20:35, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Use sbi->log_sectors_per_block to clean up below calculated one:
>>
>> unsigned int log_sectors_per_block = sbi->log_blocksize - SECTOR_SHIFT;
>
> Hello Chao,
>
> When I ran workloads on f2fs using v6.5-rcX with fixes [1][2] and a zoned block
> devices with 4kb logical block size, I observe mount failure as follows. When
> I revert this commit, the failure goes away.
>
> [ 167.781975][ T1555] F2FS-fs (dm-0): IO Block Size: 4 KB
> [ 167.890728][ T1555] F2FS-fs (dm-0): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
> [ 171.482588][ T1555] F2FS-fs (dm-0): Zone without valid block has non-zero write pointer. Reset the write pointer: wp[0x1300,0x8]
> [ 171.496000][ T1555] F2FS-fs (dm-0): (0) : Unaligned zone reset attempted (block 280000 + 80000)
> [ 171.505037][ T1555] F2FS-fs (dm-0): Discard zone failed: (errno=-5)
>
> The patch replaced "sbi->log_blocksize - SECTOR_SHIFT" with
> "sbi->log_sectors_per_block". However, I think these two are not equal when the
> device has 4k logical block size. The former uses Linux kernel sector size 512
> byte. The latter use 512b sector size or 4kb sector size depending on the
> device. mkfs.f2fs obtains logical block size via BLKSSZGET ioctl from the device
> and reflects it to the value sbi->log_sector_size_per_block. This causes
> unexpected write pointer calculations in check_zone_write_pointer(). This
> resulted in unexpected zone reset and the mount failure.
>
> I think this patch needs revert. What do you think?
Hi Shinichiro,
Oh, my bad, I think we need to revert that patch.
Thanks for the report! :)
Thanks,
>
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20230711050101.GA19128@lst.de/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20230804091556.2372567-1-shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists