[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3685d22-1be2-2376-5242-0e9a0f5471f8@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 10:10:07 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: clean up w/ sbi->log_sectors_per_block
On 2023/8/5 3:21, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 08/04, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
>> On May 23, 2023 / 20:35, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> Use sbi->log_sectors_per_block to clean up below calculated one:
>>>
>>> unsigned int log_sectors_per_block = sbi->log_blocksize - SECTOR_SHIFT;
>>
>> Hello Chao,
>>
>> When I ran workloads on f2fs using v6.5-rcX with fixes [1][2] and a zoned block
>> devices with 4kb logical block size, I observe mount failure as follows. When
>> I revert this commit, the failure goes away.
>>
>> [ 167.781975][ T1555] F2FS-fs (dm-0): IO Block Size: 4 KB
>> [ 167.890728][ T1555] F2FS-fs (dm-0): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
>> [ 171.482588][ T1555] F2FS-fs (dm-0): Zone without valid block has non-zero write pointer. Reset the write pointer: wp[0x1300,0x8]
>> [ 171.496000][ T1555] F2FS-fs (dm-0): (0) : Unaligned zone reset attempted (block 280000 + 80000)
>> [ 171.505037][ T1555] F2FS-fs (dm-0): Discard zone failed: (errno=-5)
>>
>> The patch replaced "sbi->log_blocksize - SECTOR_SHIFT" with
>> "sbi->log_sectors_per_block". However, I think these two are not equal when the
>> device has 4k logical block size. The former uses Linux kernel sector size 512
>> byte. The latter use 512b sector size or 4kb sector size depending on the
>> device. mkfs.f2fs obtains logical block size via BLKSSZGET ioctl from the device
>> and reflects it to the value sbi->log_sector_size_per_block. This causes
>> unexpected write pointer calculations in check_zone_write_pointer(). This
>> resulted in unexpected zone reset and the mount failure.
>>
>> I think this patch needs revert. What do you think?
>
> Yeah, applied the revert.
Jaegeuk, could you please send the patch to mailing list?
Thanks,
>
>>
>> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20230711050101.GA19128@lst.de/
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20230804091556.2372567-1-shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists