[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4007aa9-0320-87f3-cf7d-f5c025516d68@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 09:55:29 -0700
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
"Juergen Gross" <jgross@...e.com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/53] x86/topology: The final installment
On 8/8/2023 4:20 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> That makes much more sense now.
>
> Zhang, can you please follow up on:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/613df280116378115585d0c483f7e186cffaeb58.camel@intel.com/
>
> or otherwise I just polish up PeterZ's variant of it tomorrow.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
For the full series (with PeterZ's patch applied),
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Zhang, Thomas, please let me know if there is a different variant of the
patch that needs to be tested.
Sohil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists