[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871qgc89cu.fsf@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 12:32:33 -0400
From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: sdf@...gle.com, axboe@...nel.dk, asml.silence@...il.com,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] io_uring/cmd: Extend support beyond SOL_SOCKET
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org> writes:
> Add generic support for SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT, expanding the
> current case, that just execute if level is SOL_SOCKET.
>
> This implementation basically calls sock->ops->setsockopt() with a
> kernel allocated optval;
>
> Since the callback for ops->setsockopt() is already using sockptr_t,
> then the callbacks are leveraged to be called directly, similarly to
> __sys_setsockopt().
>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
> ---
> io_uring/uring_cmd.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> index 5404b788ca14..dbba005a7290 100644
> --- a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> +++ b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> @@ -205,10 +205,14 @@ static inline int io_uring_cmd_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> if (level == SOL_SOCKET && !sock_use_custom_sol_socket(sock))
> err = sock_setsockopt(sock, level, optname,
> USER_SOCKPTR(optval), optlen);
> + else if (unlikely(!sock->ops->setsockopt))
> + err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + else
> + err = sock->ops->setsockopt(sock, level, optname,
> + USER_SOCKPTR(koptval), optlen);
Perhaps move this logic into a helper in net/ so io_uring doesn't need
to know details of struct socket and there is no duplication of this code
in __sys_getsockopt.
> return err;
> }
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists