linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 11/50] dt-bindings: crypto: add sam9x7 in Atmel TDES

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2023 05:38:12 +0000
From:   <Varshini.Rajendran@...rochip.com>
To:     <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/50] dt-bindings: crypto: add sam9x7 in Atmel TDES

On 28/07/23 4:47 pm, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 7/28/23 11:24, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
>> Add DT bindings for atmel TDES.
> 
> NACK. The atmel crypto drivers check the version at runtime and
> fill a capabilities structure based on the version identified.
> There's a single compatible regardless of the version of the IP
> used until now, why do you want to change it?
> 
Hi Tudor,

I am aware that there is no change in the crypto IP used. This patch is 
to add a SoC specific compatible as expected by writing-bindings 
guideline. Maybe a bit more explanation in the commit description might 
do the trick.

> Please describe what motivated you to write this patch. Some people
> can't take seriously a patch if it misses a proper description and
> they just ignore it. Maybe it is worth re-reading:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes
> 
> Cheers,
> ta
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/crypto/atmel,at91sam9g46-tdes.yaml  | 6 +++++-
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/atmel,at91sam9g46-tdes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/atmel,at91sam9g46-tdes.yaml
>> index 3d6ed24b1b00..6a441f79efea 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/atmel,at91sam9g46-tdes.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/atmel,at91sam9g46-tdes.yaml
>> @@ -12,7 +12,11 @@ maintainers:
>>
>>   properties:
>>     compatible:
>> -    const: atmel,at91sam9g46-tdes
>> +    oneOf:
>> +      - const: atmel,at91sam9g46-tdes
>> +      - items:
>> +          - const: microchip,sam9x7-tdes
>> +          - const: atmel,at91sam9g46-tdes
>>
>>     reg:
>>       maxItems: 1

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Varshini Rajendran.