linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Disable interrupts categorically for Lenovo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <CUPVBIYZ2B34.P1LAY8LPFQEQ@suppilovahvero>
Date:   Fri, 11 Aug 2023 19:49:15 +0300
From:   "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     "Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Lino Sanfilippo" <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm/tpm_tis: Disable interrupts categorically for
 Lenovo

On Fri Aug 11, 2023 at 10:22 AM EEST, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 09:21:09 +0200,
> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:24:33 +0200,
> > Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > 
> > > By large most of the entries in tpm_tis_dmi_table[] are for Lenovo laptops,
> > > and they keep on coming. Therefore, disable IRQs categorically for Lenovo.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: e644b2f498d2 ("tpm, tpm_tis: Enable interrupt test")
> > > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v6.4+
> > > Reported-by: "Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@...e.de>
> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/87il9qhxjq.wl-tiwai@suse.de/
> > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > > This will be included into v6.5-rc6 PR, as long as Takashi ack's it. I'm
> > > planning to send tomorrow morning (GMT+3).
> > 
> > Feel free to take my ack:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
> > 
> > I'll build a test kernel and ask reporters for testing the fix, too.
>
> Also, it's worth to put the link to the original bug report:
>
> Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213779

These days it is recommended afaik to use "Closes:" so I used that
(checkpatch even complains if it does not exist when you have a
reported-by tag).

BR, Jarkko